Document Council's support for the Climate and Nature Bill and proposal to join the 'Zero Hour' campaign

The Chair of the Committee introduced his request for the Committee’s support in taking his proposal to the Council.  He considered that Runnymede, as a body responsible for significant areas of land, should be giving a high priority to enhancing the natural environment and increasing biodiversity.

The Committee debated the Chair’s proposal.

Many members were in support of the approach that had been proposed by the Chair, echoing the views that he had presented to the Committee.  It was also suggested that it was important for the Council to demonstrate that it was taking the matter of climate change and the environment generally seriously, particularly because it had declared a ‘climate emergency’.

Other members, whilst supportive of the sentiments laid down, were concerned that the Council should not be publicly endorsing legislation that was in the early stages of the parliamentary process, particularly because it was likely to be subject to changes following the consideration of MPs and Lords.

There was discussion over whether it was appropriate for councils to lobby parliament in the manner that was proposed, particularly because of the uncertainty over what any eventual piece of legislation would encompass.  In response to this comment, it was stated that many councils and other bodies were already lending their support to the Bill, which had also received support from a number of MPs representing various political parties.  It was stated that the Bill had also been supported by a number of academics and scientists.  Additionally, the Chair stated that should the Bill not pass its second reading in the House of Commons, the matter would not be debated by the Council.

It was proposed and seconded that the Committee defer further consideration of this item, to a point after which the Bill received Royal Assent.  The proposal was subject to a named vote, with the voting noted as follows:

In favour of deferral (3)

Councillors Hulley, Lewis and Saise-Marshall.

Against deferral (7)

Councillors D. Whyte, Ringham, Gahir, Gates, Harnden, Milstead and Rowsell.

Abstentions (0)

The proposal to defer further consideration of this item FELL.

The proposed resolution of the Council was the subject of a named vote, with the voting noted as follows:

In favour (7)

Councillors D. Whyte, Ringham, Gahir, Gates, Harnden, Milstead and Rowsell.

Against (1)

Councillor Hulley.

Abstentions (2)

Councillors Lewis and Saise-Marshall.

It was resolved that:

1)    The Chair’s proposed resolution of the Council be agreed.

2)    In the event the Climate and Nature Bill passes its second reading in the House of Commons on 24 January 2025, the Chair’s proposed recommendation be put to the Council on 27 February 2025.